Across the contact sheet several pieces read as flimsy, and I called that
systemic before measuring it. Measured, it is two models out of three.
The bench seat was height * 0.09, which is 40 mm on a bench 1.62 m long --
one fortieth of its own span, against roughly one twentieth in the
reference. The table top was height * 0.045, a 33 mm plank across 1.9 m.
Both are now about half again as thick. Medieval furniture is riven rather
than machined: the board is whatever the log gave, and a thin slab over a
long span also looks like it would flex, which is the specific way these
were reading as cheap.
The fence, which looked as thin as either, measures fine -- 150 mm posts
on a 1.25 m fence. What made it look spindly is that the default is 4.8 m
long, so the whole run gets scaled down to fit the frame while the
reference shows a single short section. That is a framing artefact, not a
defect, and nothing about the fence changes here.
The bench also gets the arch cut out of its feet. It is not decoration: a
plank leg standing on its whole edge rocks on any floor that is not flat,
and no medieval floor was, so the cut leaves two feet per board and gives
the bench four points to find the ground with. It is also the most
recognisable line in the silhouette and the reference has it. There are no
booleans in this geometry -- it is all non-indexed triangle soup -- so the
notch is made by building the board in three pieces and not filling it.
27 models, 18647 triangles, all checks pass, 0 floating cases, build clean.
CRT
2772064c14